Skip to Main Content

What Is Mediation, and Do I Have to Participate?


Quick Answer

Mediation is a structured settlement process where a neutral third party (the mediator) helps the parties negotiate a resolution. The mediator does not decide who wins or loses, and mediation is not a trial. In Nevada personal injury cases, mediation is often used after discovery clarifies the facts and damages, or when a court sets a settlement conference or ADR event. If a Nevada court orders mediation or a settlement conference, you generally must attend and participate as required by the court’s scheduling and case management authority. NRCP 16; NRCP 16.1.

If the case settles at mediation, the settlement is typically enforceable under Nevada contract principles. May v. Anderson, 121 Nev. 668, 119 P.3d 1254 (2005).

1) What mediation is, and what it is not

A) What it is

Mediation is a confidential negotiation process that typically includes:

  • a joint opening (sometimes skipped),
  • private caucuses (separate rooms),
  • negotiation guided by a neutral mediator,
  • movement toward a written settlement if terms are reached.

B) What it is not

  • It is not a public hearing.
  • It is not a trial.
  • The mediator does not issue a judgment.
  • You do not “win” mediation, you either settle or you do not.

2) Why mediation is so common in Nevada injury cases

Mediation is commonly used because it can:

  • reduce expense compared to continued litigation,
  • avoid trial risk, including unpredictable fault allocation and credibility calls,
  • give the injured person more control over timing and outcome,
  • resolve lien and reimbursement issues with more flexibility than a verdict.

Mediation often becomes productive after the parties obtain:

  • key medical records,
  • wage loss documentation,
  • deposition testimony, and
  • expert opinions where needed. NRCP 26; NRCP 30; NRCP 16.1.

3) Do you have to participate in mediation in Nevada?

A) If it is voluntary

If both sides agree to mediate privately, participation is voluntary.

B) If the court orders it

Nevada courts have case management authority to schedule conferences and take steps to facilitate settlement as part of managing the case. NRCP 16; NRCP 16.1.

If a court orders mediation or a settlement conference, the parties generally must:

  • appear as ordered,
  • participate as directed, and
  • comply with court instructions and deadlines.

A failure to comply with court-ordered processes can lead to case consequences depending on the circumstances and the court’s orders.

4) Mediation confidentiality and “can what I say be used against me?”

Settlement negotiations are generally not admissible to prove liability or the amount of a claim, subject to exceptions. NRS 48.105.

The practical point for clients is this: mediation is designed to encourage candid settlement negotiation without fear that reasonable compromise discussions will be used as trial evidence.

Even with confidentiality principles, you should still be careful, accurate, and strategic in what is communicated, especially when dealing with disputed causation or disputed future treatment.

5) What makes mediation successful in Nevada personal injury cases

A) Preparation, the demand should look like a trial file

The strongest mediation position usually includes:

  • a clear liability narrative,
  • photos and video,
  • a clean medical timeline,
  • a causation explanation (especially with preexisting conditions),
  • itemized damages with documentation,
  • wage loss proof and restrictions.

If medical causation is disputed and beyond common knowledge, Nevada generally requires competent medical testimony stated to a reasonable degree of medical probability. Morsicato v. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc., 121 Nev. 153, 111 P.3d 1112 (2005). Williams v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. 518, 262 P.3d 360 (2011).

B) Understanding comparative negligence risk

Nevada’s modified comparative negligence statute can reduce damages proportionally and can bar recovery if the plaintiff’s negligence is greater than the defendants’ combined negligence. NRS 41.141; Warmbrodt v. Blanchard, 100 Nev. 703, 692 P.2d 1282 (1984).

A realistic comparative fault analysis is often the difference between a productive mediation and an impasse.

C) Knowing the “net” after liens

A mediation number must account for liens and reimbursement claims that can materially reduce what the injured person actually receives.

Common Nevada frameworks include:

  • hospital liens. NRS 108.590; NRS 108.610.
  • Medicaid reimbursement rights. NRS 422.293.
  • workers’ compensation liens in third-party cases. NRS 616C.215.

6) If the case settles, get it in writing and understand the release

If mediation results in a settlement, the agreement must be documented carefully. Settlements are generally treated as contracts under Nevada law, and once a release is signed, the settlement is typically final. May v. Anderson, 121 Nev. 668, 119 P.3d 1254 (2005).

Before you sign, your lawyer should confirm:

  • the release scope (injury versus property damage, known versus unknown injuries)
  • who pays liens and how they are handled
  • confidentiality terms (if any)
  • whether the settlement includes Medicare or Medicaid compliance issues if relevant

7) If the case does not settle, what happens next

If mediation does not resolve the case, the lawsuit continues through:

  • remaining discovery,
  • expert work,
  • dispositive motions, and
  • trial preparation under the court’s schedule. NRCP 16; NRCP 16.1; NRCP 26.

Many cases resolve later through continued negotiation, another mediation session, or statutory offer-of-judgment strategies. NRS 17.115; NRCP 68; Beattie v. Thomas, 99 Nev. 579, 668 P.2d 268 (1983).


Nevada legal authorities cited

  • NRS 17.115.
  • NRS 41.141.
  • NRS 48.105.
  • NRS 108.590.
  • NRS 108.610.
  • NRS 422.293.
  • NRS 616C.215.
  • Beattie v. Thomas, 99 Nev. 579, 668 P.2d 268 (1983).
  • May v. Anderson, 121 Nev. 668, 119 P.3d 1254 (2005).
  • Morsicato v. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc., 121 Nev. 153, 111 P.3d 1112 (2005).
  • Warmbrodt v. Blanchard, 100 Nev. 703, 692 P.2d 1282 (1984).
  • Williams v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. 518, 262 P.3d 360 (2011).
  • NRCP 16.
  • NRCP 16.1.
  • NRCP 26.
  • NRCP 68.

If you need assistance with your personal injury case, don’t hesitate to contact Friedman Injury Law.


Friedman Injury Law
375 N. Stephanie St., Ste. 1411
Henderson, NV 89014
P: (702) 970-4222
W: blakefriedmanlaw.com